Monday, 16 May 2011

The Rule of Law vs. Not getting shot

By Neil McCulloch

I’ve just been reading a great paper* by Stephan Haggard at the University of California on the Rule of Law.  It’s one of those papers that you read and say to yourself, “yes, that’s all pretty obvious”, and then realise that what he has made obvious is the opposite of received wisdom on the subject!

What he does is gather data across a large number of countries on various measures of the “Rule of Law”. There is a small industry producing such measures these days, since everyone realised that institutions and governance were critical for development. 

Haggard takes some of the most common measures:
  • Property rights (how much real control you have over your assets) and how well contracts are enforced  (the traditional literature says that these are really important for long-run economic growth)
  • Security of person (whether there is lots of violence and you are likely to get murdered)
  • Measures on the checks and balances on government
  • Measures of corruption
  • And a couple of popular aggregate measures such as the Rule of Law indices from the World Bank and from the World Economic Forum.

Then what he shows is, to me at least, an eye opener.  He finds that:
  1. These measures really aren’t that well correlated, i.e. they really are measuring different things.
  2. He replicates a famous study by Acemoglu, Johnson and Robinson (2001), which purports to show that property rights are crucial to long-run economic growth, and shows that, pretty much any of the above measures of the Rule of Law might have been driving that result. In other words, it might not be property rights at all, it might be less corruption, or better checks and balances on government or better security – you just can’t tell.
  3. When you look at how long-run economic growth is affected by all of these measures individually, the only one that matters is the aggregate Rule of Law index – and that is probably driven by corruption, not property rights.
Finally, he finds something which makes so much sense it is slightly embarrassing that us governancy-types tend to ignore it – that physical security and conflict have a big negative effect on growth and make growth much more volatile. Of course this isn’t new – Paul Collier has written a whole book (called Wars, Guns and Votes) on the subject and IDS has a large MICROCON research project on it. But, given the huge efforts expended on fancy governance interventions, it is worth being reminded that the evidence strongly supports the obvious point that establishing basic security of person is an essential pre-requisite to any kind of economic development.

* Stephan Haggard and Lydia Tiede, 'The Rule of Law and Economic Growth: Where are We?', World Development Vol. 39, No. 5, pp. 673-85, 2011


Emilie Wilson said...

Really enjoyed your blog today, Neil. Does this mean that it's a good thing that the 'UK Strategic Defence and Security Review stipulated that 30 percent of DfID funding go to fragile and conflict-affected states'?

More in Guardian article OECD aid figures and UK aid spending:

audit attorney port st lucie said...

I've been meaning to talk about my wonderful experience with audit attorney port st lucie for a long time!!!I hate critters, and have been with a number of different companies! The office staff is always very helpful and friendly; they're always quick to take care of all my problems!

Eva smith said...

That’s a nice site you people are carrying out there.

Boznos Law Office

Elen Desouza said...

The superb highly informative blog I’m about to share this with all my contacts.

DUI attorneys said...

I spoke to a legal assistant first and was transferred to an attorney. I spoke to Criminal Defense law firm and he spent a great of time with me. DUI attorneys he gave me a lot of advice even though he didn't take on my mom's case. I am honestly surprised how genuine he was. I would definitely recommend him!

Lawyer said...

Jeffrey A. Tenenbaum Lawyer is a highly respected attorney in the Bay Area. I know this because I work with a very large number of attorneys throughout Santa Clara, San Mateo, San Francisco, and Alameda counties. We have shared some mutual clients and I have never experienced anything less than exceptional work from his firm….